Bucket Vs ConfigCat

Bucket is a ConfigCat alternative, providing purpose-built feature management for SaaS that run on TypeScript.

What makes Bucket different?

Built for SaaS
Not for every use case, just yours: B2B SaaS.
Built for everything
A general solution including B2C and ecommerce use cases.
Fast & intuitive
Clean UI with opinionated defaults. Or skip it with CLI or MCP.
Confusing UI
The UI is unintuitive and it’s difficult to configure advanced flag logic or manage many flags.
Beta feature workflow
Give some customers early-access, capture feedback, and track adoption to perfect features faster.
ConfigCat lacks native reporting
Relying on third-party integrations to visualize flag analytics and provide insights into usage or adoption.
Automated cleanup
AI identifies unused flags and auto-creates PRs in GitHub for you.
Manual cleanup
Shows repos with flag references, but you’re still on the hook to do the work.

Bucket’s pricing is simple and preditcable

Pricing is based on Monthly Tracked Users. No need to track config downloads, flags, environments, products, segments, permissions, traffic, and webhooks.

Monthly Tracked Users (MTUs)
Tooltip icon
-
Config JSON downloads
-
Flags
-
Environments
-
Products
-
Segments
-
Permission groups
-
Network traffic
-
Webhooks
-

All the same feature flagging essentials

Bucket has all the key features ConfigCat does.

Targeting rules
Segments
Environments
Percentage rollouts
Release kill switch

Compare Bucket to...

See how Bucket differs from LaunchDarkly, PostHog, Harness, Split, Unleash, or homegrown solutions.

“Bucket goes beyond simple feature flagging and empowers us with a complete feature delivery platform.”

Samy Pessé

CTO, GitBook